You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
== Failed tests ================================================================
-- Error ('test-lint_dir.R:92:3'): lint_dir works with specific linters without specifying other arguments --
Error in `check_dots(dot_names, c("lint", "exclude", "parse_exclusions"))`: x Found unknown arguments in `...`: `NA`.
i Check for typos and see ?eval for valid arguments.
Backtrace:
x
1. +-testthat::expect_length(...) at test-lint_dir.R:92:3
2. | \-testthat::quasi_label(enquo(object), arg = "object")
3. | \-rlang::eval_bare(expr, quo_get_env(quo))
4. \-lintr::lint_dir(the_dir, assignment_linter(), parse_settings = FALSE)
5. \-lintr:::check_dots(dot_names, c("lint", "exclude", "parse_exclusions")) at lintr/R/lint.R:152:3
6. \-cli::cli_abort(...) at lintr/R/utils.R:279:3
7. \-rlang::abort(...)
-- Error ('test-lint_dir.R:101:3'): linting empty directory passes -------------
Error in `check_dots(dot_names, c("lint", "exclude", "parse_exclusions"))`: x Found unknown arguments in `...`: `NA`.
i Check for typos and see ?eval for valid arguments.
Backtrace:
x
1. +-testthat::expect_length(...) at test-lint_dir.R:101:3
2. | \-testthat::quasi_label(enquo(object), arg = "object")
3. | \-rlang::eval_bare(expr, quo_get_env(quo))
4. \-lintr::lint_dir(withr::local_tempdir(), any_duplicated_linter())
5. \-lintr:::check_dots(dot_names, c("lint", "exclude", "parse_exclusions")) at lintr/R/lint.R:152:3
6. \-cli::cli_abort(...) at lintr/R/utils.R:279:3
7. \-rlang::abort(...)
I see some code already related to 4.1.{1,2}, not sure why it's still an issue on all of 4.1.*.
Filing for now without a plan to fix before release. If there's an easy fix, we can put it into a follow-up patch release (3.2.2). Otherwise, those arguments are slated for complete removal come next "real" release, so I would just ignore this & remove that code already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm seeing this on GHA:
e.g.
https://github.com/r-lib/lintr/actions/runs/13272849355/job/37056120641
I see some code already related to 4.1.{1,2}, not sure why it's still an issue on all of 4.1.*.
Filing for now without a plan to fix before release. If there's an easy fix, we can put it into a follow-up patch release (3.2.2). Otherwise, those arguments are slated for complete removal come next "real" release, so I would just ignore this & remove that code already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: