You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've found autoapi to be a great alternative to autodoc/autosummary since the program I'm developing relies on external software that must be running during operation, and as a result must launched when generating documentation via autodoc/autosummary. However, autoapi does not appear to have any coverage-checking functionality like sphinx.ext.coverage. Attempting to use sphinx.ext.coverage alongside autoapi does not appear to work. In any case even if it did, sphinx.ext.coverage also shares autodoc's problem of needing to import the relevant modules, and therefore has the associated side-effects (in my case, requiring that the external software be running).
Are there any plans to implement any form of coverage checking to mimic sphinx.ext.coverage?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've found autoapi to be a great alternative to autodoc/autosummary since the program I'm developing relies on external software that must be running during operation, and as a result must launched when generating documentation via autodoc/autosummary. However, autoapi does not appear to have any coverage-checking functionality like sphinx.ext.coverage. Attempting to use sphinx.ext.coverage alongside autoapi does not appear to work. In any case even if it did, sphinx.ext.coverage also shares autodoc's problem of needing to import the relevant modules, and therefore has the associated side-effects (in my case, requiring that the external software be running).
Are there any plans to implement any form of coverage checking to mimic sphinx.ext.coverage?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: