You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Sometimes ISLa only produces a correct result for infix AND, but not for S-expr AND. It seems like the S-expr AND constraint is completely ignored.
To Reproduce
Run the python program below. It should produce the same results for all three versions of the same constraint, but only the infix version produces the correct result.
This is indeed a bug. I will put it on hold for a while. I don't consider mixing the S-expr and "mathematical" style a good "feature" and want to prevent this since it broke many things. I plan to offer different ISLa concrete syntax parsers with exclusive support for either S-expr or mathematical.
Describe the bug
Sometimes ISLa only produces a correct result for infix AND, but not for S-expr AND. It seems like the S-expr AND constraint is completely ignored.
To Reproduce
Run the python program below. It should produce the same results for all three versions of the same constraint, but only the infix version produces the correct result.
Expected behavior
Infix and S-expr AND should have the same result.
System/Installation Specs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: