-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathbibliography.bib
146 lines (132 loc) · 6.35 KB
/
bibliography.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
@article{arslan2019,
author = {Ruben C. Arslan},
title ={How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse},
journal = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {169-187},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1177/2515245919838783}
}
@article{chambers2019,
author = {Chris Chambers},
title ={What's next for Registered Reports?},
journal = {Nature},
volume = {573},
pages = {187-189},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6}
}
@article{debruine2002,
author = {Lisa DeBruine},
title ={Facial resemblance enhances trust},
journal = {Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences},
volume = {269},
pages = {1307–1312},
year = {2002},
doi = {10.1098/rspb.2002.2034}
}
@article{dienes2019,
author = {Zoltan Dienes},
title ={How Do {I} Know What My Theory Predicts?},
journal = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {364-377},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1177/2515245919876960}
}
@book{lakatos1978,
author = {I. Lakatos},
year = {1978},
title = {The methodology of scientific research programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical papers.},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press}
}
@article{lakens2018,
author = {Daniël Lakens and Anne M. Scheel and Peder M. Isager},
title ={Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial},
journal = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {259-269},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1177/2515245918770963}
}
@article{neyman1933,
author = {Neyman, Jerzy and Pearson, Egon Sharpe},
title = {On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses},
journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character},
volume = {231},
number = {694-706},
pages = {289-337},
year = {1933},
doi = {10.1098/rsta.1933.0009}
}
@article{simonsohn2014,
author = {Uri Simonsohn and Leif D. Nelson and Joseph P. Simmons},
title ={p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results},
journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {666-681},
year = {2014},
doi = {10.1177/1745691614553988}
}
@article{brunner2020,
author = {J. Brunner and Ulrich Schimmack},
year = {2020},
title = {Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance},
journal = {Meta-Psychology},
volume = {4},
pages = {1-22},
doi = {10.15626/MP.2018.874}
}
@article{meehl1990,
author={Paul E. Meehl},
year = {1990},
title = {Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles That Warrant It},
journal = {Psychological Inquiry},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {108-141}
}
@misc{claesen2019,
title={Preregistration: Comparing Dream to Reality},
url={psyarxiv.com/d8wex},
DOI={10.31234/osf.io/d8wex},
publisher={PsyArXiv},
author={Claesen, Aline and Gomes, Sara L B T and Tuerlinckx, Francis and Vanpaemel, Wolf},
year={2019},
month={May}
}
@article{lakens2019,
author = {Daniel Lakens},
title = {The value of preregistration for psychological science: A conceptual analysis},
journal = {Japanese Psychological Review},
year = {2019},
volume = {62},
number = {3},
pages = {221-230},
doi = {}
}
@article{bids2016,
author = {Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski and Tibor Auer and Vince D. Calhoun and R. Cameron Craddock and Samir Das and Eugene P. Duff and Guillaume Flandin and Satrajit S. Ghosh and Tristan Glatard and Yaroslav O. Halchenko and Daniel A. Handwerker and Michael Hanke and David Keator and Xiangrui Li and Zachary Michael and Camille Maumet and B. Nolan Nichols and Thomas E. Nichols and John Pellman and Jean-Baptiste Poline and Ariel Rokem and Gunnar Schaefer and Vanessa Sochat and William Triplett and Jessica A. Turner and Gaël Varoquaux and Russell A. Poldrack},
title = {The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments},
journal = {Nature Scientific Data},
volume = {3},
number = {160044},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1038/sdata.2016.44}
}
@article{scheel_why_2020,
title = {Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses},
url = {https://psyarxiv.com/vekpu/},
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/vekpu},
abstract = {For almost half a century, Paul Meehl educated psychologists about how the mindless use of null-hypothesis significance tests made research on theories in the social sciences basically uninterpretable (Meehl, 1990). In response to the replication crisis, reforms in psychology have focused on formalising procedures for testing hypotheses. These reforms were necessary and impactful. However, as an unexpected consequence, psychologists have begun to realise that they may not be ready to test hypotheses. Forcing researchers to prematurely test hypotheses before they have established a sound ‘derivation chain’ between test and theory is counterproductive. Instead, various non-confirmatory research activities should be used to obtain the inputs necessary to make hypothesis tests informative. Before testing hypotheses, researchers should spend more time forming concepts, developing valid measures, establishing the causal relationships between concepts and their functional form, and identifying boundary conditions and auxiliary assumptions. Providing these inputs should be recognised and incentivised as a crucial goal in and of itself. In this article, we discuss how shifting the focus to non-confirmatory research can tie together many loose ends of psychology’s reform movement and help us lay the foundation to develop strong, testable theories, as Paul Meehl urged us to.},
urldate = {2020-09-06},
journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
author = {Scheel, Anne M. and Tiokhin, Leonid and Isager, Peder M. and Lakens, Daniel},
year = {2020},
note = {Publisher: PsyArXiv},
file = {Scheel et al_2020_Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses.pdf:C\:\\Users\\dlakens\\Zotero\\storage\\HJ94D67H\\Scheel et al_2020_Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\dlakens\\Zotero\\storage\\WQMB2Y6I\\vekpu.html:text/html}
}