separate function (related to visibility) should be removed

[nsaunders]

The separate function declared here should be removed.

[ddssff]

Added here: 4221200

[turion]

Ah, so it seems the type signature borderCollapse :: Visibility -> Css is actually wrong? There is a comment here 4221200#diff-a82ec625bccfadbae37e6579b4a63ecadcd99a3090a43478674483df463b4a24R160-R170 describing a cleaner but lengthier alternative. I'd prefer that alternative as well, but it will trigger a major version bump.

[nsaunders]

Good find @turion. As you know, naming conflicts have been resolved with "namespacing" before, so that would certainly be an option. On the other hand, could this be resolved with, say, a Collapse type class (similar to global keywords)? If so, I suppose it would still technically break compatibility, but (if I'm thinking about it correctly) existing code should still compile... What do you think?

[github-actions]

This issue has not seen any activity in a long time. If no further activity occurs, it will be closed after ten weeks.

[turion]

I think a Collapse type class is worth a shot.