Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare resample_poly with decimate #363

Open
kkappler opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Compare resample_poly with decimate #363

kkappler opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@kkappler
Copy link
Collaborator

kkappler commented Dec 7, 2024

Currently using scipy.signal.decimate in time_series_helpers.py. resample_poly seems faster and has more capabilities.

Before switching over, setting up a tool to compare results of both and running it on some example time series should be done. This could be put into a test.

A preliminary test has been created in aurora/tests/synthetic/test_decimation_methods.py

This currently compares aurora's prototype_decimate function with mth5's built-in run_ts.sps_filters.decimate

kkappler added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant