You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Continuation-based monads cannot have instances of MonadUnliftIO, the same as MonadBaseControl and MonadMask.
Am I right to see Snap as a "continuation-based" monad? If so, is the MonadBaseControl instance flawed or wrong at all?
Basically, I need to escape from Snap into nested IO, to run some scripting code leveraging STM, where I want to perform writeText etc. by the scripts to generate proper http payload. Ideally I want to wrap the full set of Snap API available for scripting, how can I do that?
I'd like to contribute some new public API if that's lacking and doable, but need some guidance and esp. a confirmation before heading that way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Naively I tried liftBaseWith in a
Snap
action but innerwriteText
produces no effect at all.I'm not sure I used
MonadBaseControl
correctly, but I failed to find a user side example on Github (as there're only instance impl. hits).And quoting fpco/unliftio#17 (comment)
Am I right to see
Snap
as a "continuation-based" monad? If so, is theMonadBaseControl
instance flawed or wrong at all?Basically, I need to escape from
Snap
into nestedIO
, to run some scripting code leveragingSTM
, where I want to performwriteText
etc. by the scripts to generate proper http payload. Ideally I want to wrap the full set of Snap API available for scripting, how can I do that?I'd like to contribute some new public API if that's lacking and doable, but need some guidance and esp. a confirmation before heading that way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: