-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Investigate page and chapter statements #296
Comments
In the old bb.rdf from the repository (last update: 2017-08-01), there are only 494 occurrences of page, see
And for comparison the empty ones:
|
There don't seem to be any pages for triples, just for classes and relations. Maybe they are mistakenly placed in the relations? How many are there at maximum for a single subject?
Result: At most two per subject, which looks fine. Next Step: Look at the old extraction table of bb to find out if there are page statements that are missing now. |
They were there all along in the spreadsheet, all dumps in the repository and on the SPARQL endpoint. It just wasn't found because the property name is TripelPage.
|
Are the axiom still bound to valid subjects and objects? Get an overview via:
Hard to see, rewrite blank nodes to so that they are in the namespace of their subontology and can be viewed via LodView. |
rename blank nodes to "real" nodesblank nodes in subject position
blank nodes in object position
|
Rename bb subject
Analogously ob rename bb object
|
investigate whether the axioms source and targets still exist
Result: 16 missing, so it seems to work in general. Separate issue: #297 |
We only seem to have sparse page and chapter data. Investigate how many we have and in which form and if we lost any through the remodels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: