You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking at some numbers today and noticed that there was a significant overhead of using toPullStream in some cases. The following query takes 2.4 seconds:
It turns out that toPullStream actually does pagination internally in all cases. Tweaking this number made quite a difference. So I'm wondering how this number came about? And if it should be something like maybe 1000 instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was looking at some numbers today and noticed that there was a significant overhead of using toPullStream in some cases. The following query takes 2.4 seconds:
while:
takes 1.2s.
It turns out that toPullStream actually does pagination internally in all cases. Tweaking this number made quite a difference. So I'm wondering how this number came about? And if it should be something like maybe 1000 instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: