Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

join_feature, allow to select a slot (e.g. scaled, raw etc..) #64

Closed
stemangiola opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 12 comments · Fixed by #69
Closed

join_feature, allow to select a slot (e.g. scaled, raw etc..) #64

stemangiola opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 12 comments · Fixed by #69
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@noriakis
Copy link
Contributor

@stemangiola Hello, I would like to contribute to this feature. Would there be any specific consideration for this?
Thank you for maintaining this important project.

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

stemangiola commented Aug 16, 2023

Amazing!

I think it is pretty straightforward.

for join_feature shape="wide" it works because I have updated the function get_abundance_sc_wide.

However, for shape="long" it does not because I have not updated the function get_abundance_sc_long with the right argument and used GetAssayData

@stemangiola stemangiola moved this from Todo to In Progress in tidyomics open challenges Aug 16, 2023
@noriakis
Copy link
Contributor

@stemangiola Thank you for your reply and instructions. I will make a pull request when the feature is ready.

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

@noriakis when you manage you first commit please add your authorship details here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19XqhN3xAMekCJ-esAolzoWT6fttruSEermjIsrOFcoo/edit?usp=sharing

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks @noriakis for your PR!

@noriakis
Copy link
Contributor

noriakis commented Aug 22, 2023

@stemangiola Thank you very much for merging the PR, and I have added the detail to the google spreadsheet.

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

@stemangiola Thank you very much for merging the PR.

Thanks to you, in case you were interested, as you already have experience in tidyseurat I just point to another cool challenge about adapting tidyseurat documentation to tidySingleCellExperiment

#66

Of course no expectations.

@noriakis
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for mentioning. Yes, I would very much like to contribute!

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

Thank you for mentioning. Yes, I would very much like to contribute!

Amazing, in that case, please make yourself notice in the challenge commenting. And I will assign you ;)

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

Just to make 100% sure, the goal would be to update tidyseurat, not tidySingleCellExperiment (which is your reference). :)

@noriakis
Copy link
Contributor

@stemangiola Thank you for the clarification! Am I correct in understanding that I should be modifying tidyseurat documentation to be in line with the modification of tidySingleCellExperiment documentation, which has been discussed in #66?

@stemangiola
Copy link
Owner Author

@stemangiola Thank you for the clarification! Am I correct in understanding that I should be modifying tidyseurat documentation to be in line with the modification of tidySingleCellExperiment documentation, which has been discussed in #66?

correct

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants