You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #91 a user pointed out that a broken pipe during a partial write to stdout can occur as a normal matter of course (either due to ending a pseudo-seeking consumer like less early, or only needing a prefix of the decrypted file). We should not make this a hard error, and instead log a warning (if logging is enabled).
A broken pipe after no reading should IMO still be an error; if a user is explicitly trying to decrypt a file, but no downstream tool makes any attempt to use it, that seems like a bug in either the downstream tools or the user's command construction, and silently doing nothing would be terrible UX.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #91 a user pointed out that a broken pipe during a partial write to stdout can occur as a normal matter of course (either due to ending a pseudo-seeking consumer like
less
early, or only needing a prefix of the decrypted file). We should not make this a hard error, and instead log a warning (if logging is enabled).A broken pipe after no reading should IMO still be an error; if a user is explicitly trying to decrypt a file, but no downstream tool makes any attempt to use it, that seems like a bug in either the downstream tools or the user's command construction, and silently doing nothing would be terrible UX.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: