You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed this sentence at the very end of the README:
For now only linear revision history is supported.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that. We've made some tests with non-linear dependency graphs, and our migrations seem to be applied correctly.
So, is this something we should worry about, or did you just mean there's no support for squash migrations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At some point I had assertion that checked if there is no more than 1 dependency in migration since I wasn't quite sure if everything was covered for them, hence the only "linear revision history" support.
As for is graph stable - execution is always dictated by name order. While there is no plan to change it I guess some new unit tests (of MigrationsGraph.__iter__ at least, including migrations with multiple dependencies) should be added before we can guarantee that this is won't change anytime in the future.
I've noticed this sentence at the very end of the README:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that. We've made some tests with non-linear dependency graphs, and our migrations seem to be applied correctly.
So, is this something we should worry about, or did you just mean there's no support for squash migrations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: