You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there any broader value to creating an option to fit the total mass (Mtot) and the mass ratio (q) rather than the individual masses?
For context, I am fitting an orbit for a young binary that has poorly constrained individual stellar masses (due to the fact that it is young -- large model uncertainties), but it's components are near equal brightness and therefore a tight prior can be placed on the mass ratio. The data I am fitting are relative astrometry (23 epochs) and relative RVs (2 epochs).
Do any internal folks have the interest/bandwidth to take this on?
Thanks,
Ben Tofflemire
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
Is there any broader value to creating an option to fit the total mass (Mtot) and the mass ratio (q) rather than the individual masses?
For context, I am fitting an orbit for a young binary that has poorly constrained individual stellar masses (due to the fact that it is young -- large model uncertainties), but it's components are near equal brightness and therefore a tight prior can be placed on the mass ratio. The data I am fitting are relative astrometry (23 epochs) and relative RVs (2 epochs).
Do any internal folks have the interest/bandwidth to take this on?
Thanks,
Ben Tofflemire
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: