Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to fit q and Mtot rather than M1, M2? #59

Open
tofflemire opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Option to fit q and Mtot rather than M1, M2? #59

tofflemire opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@tofflemire
Copy link

Hi there,

Is there any broader value to creating an option to fit the total mass (Mtot) and the mass ratio (q) rather than the individual masses?

For context, I am fitting an orbit for a young binary that has poorly constrained individual stellar masses (due to the fact that it is young -- large model uncertainties), but it's components are near equal brightness and therefore a tight prior can be placed on the mass ratio. The data I am fitting are relative astrometry (23 epochs) and relative RVs (2 epochs).

Do any internal folks have the interest/bandwidth to take this on?

Thanks,
Ben Tofflemire

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant