Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update number of shells in SimulationState #2467

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

DeerWhale
Copy link
Contributor

📝 Description

Type: 🪲 bugfix | 🚦 testing

Update the no_of_shells attribute in SimulationState to be the no_of_shells_active in geometry.
This can make sure the dimensionality of the attributes in the SimulationState is consistent with the activate shells after changing the v_inner_boundary value on fly.

📌 Resources

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

  • Testing pipeline
  • Other method (describe)
  • My changes can't be tested (explain why)

☑️ Checklist

  • I requested two reviewers for this pull request
  • I updated the documentation according to my changes
  • I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

@andrewfullard
Copy link
Contributor

These changes in model/base.py may be replaced by work @wkerzendorf is doing. Or this should be merged into #2445

@DeerWhale DeerWhale changed the title Update no of shells in SimulationState Update number of shells in SimulationState Nov 7, 2023
@wkerzendorf
Copy link
Member

@DeerWhale the tests fail.

@tardis-bot
Copy link
Contributor

tardis-bot commented Nov 20, 2023

*beep* *bop*

Hi, human.

The docs workflow has failed

Click here to see the build log.

@Rodot-
Copy link
Contributor

Rodot- commented Dec 18, 2023

Is there any update on this? I believe CSVY models are still broken until this is merged.

@DeerWhale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this duplicated one -- the (almost) same edits is made in a new PR #2504 after the restructure.

@DeerWhale DeerWhale closed this Jan 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants