You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is currently a limitation of the structure, because it is based on table names. I believe there was a PR somewhere to allow aliases, which might provide a workaround.
I have a table
orders
.There is two columns
disponent_id
&salesman_id
.Both have foreign key to the
users
tableid
. If I don't overwrite a scheme, then it's used last one so onlyuser
paired to thesalesman_id
.So I tried to overwrite schema like in #41. Now my relation to the
users
table looks like:I think this is a bad design, but I need to pair two users from different groups because of internal settlement.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: