You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You could also make a version based on a Cuckoo Cycle variant.
The recently discovered Cuckarone seems particularly suitable,
as it doesn't allow for the easily parallelizable edge trimming,
reducing the problem to following paths in a random graph.
With a cycle length of 4, it has 2^4/4 = 4 expected solutions per graph,
and with 16 edge bits, the graph has 2^16 edges, comparable to the (60,3)
parameters for EquiX.
This is more of a NOTE than an issue.
You could also make a version based on a Cuckoo Cycle variant.
The recently discovered Cuckarone seems particularly suitable,
as it doesn't allow for the easily parallelizable edge trimming,
reducing the problem to following paths in a random graph.
With a cycle length of 4, it has 2^4/4 = 4 expected solutions per graph,
and with 16 edge bits, the graph has 2^16 edges, comparable to the (60,3)
parameters for EquiX.
[1] https://forum.grin.mw/t/critical-pow-vulnerability-closed-the-accidental-birth-of-a-new-pow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: