Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

q-exactive support #11

Closed
trishorts opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

q-exactive support #11

trishorts opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@trishorts
Copy link

what is the status of this?

@dbaileychess dbaileychess self-assigned this Feb 6, 2018
@dbaileychess
Copy link
Contributor

We are looking into possible solutions of hosting the QE IAPI either in this repo or in its own. We have not finalized that decision yet, but I will keep this issue updated on those developments.

@trishorts
Copy link
Author

thanks Derek. really looking forward to this.

@tobiasko
Copy link

Hi Derek,

following your ASMS2018 talk entitled:

"iAPI Development and XML Modification Overview: Thermo Scientific™ Tribrid™ and Exactive™ MS Series"

What is the current situation? Is there a separate iAPI for FUSION and Exactive platforms? Or is this repo now the main entry point for both systems? The current situation is pretty confusing.

Greetings,
Tobi

@dbaileychess
Copy link
Contributor

Tobi,

There is a functionally equivalent, binary-incompatible, version of the iAPI for the Fusion-series instruments. Both APIs are now hosted in this repo. We kept the two APIs in one repo since they do share so much in common that a shared issue-tracker and documentation made sense. Directories are split between Exactive-Series and Tribrid-Series files.

I will be adding more documentation in the upcoming weeks to help clarify the distinction. Please let me know of any specifics on the confusion and I will attempt to address them.

@tobiasko
Copy link

Hi Derek,

the mayor point of confusion is currently the licence agreement. There is one agreement for all platforms?

Greetings,
Tobi

@tobiasko
Copy link

Hi Derek,

which Tune version is needed on the Exactive platforms?

Greetings,
Tobi

@jesse-canterbury
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this as obsolete. If there is still a need to address anything here, feel free to submit a new issue with updated information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants