You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Jakob and I think it would be better to have phase names (with priorities) and node names (without priorities) than the current setup where we only have node names with priorities, and the phase name is the node name with highest priority.
Introduce phase names and change phase name selection procedure
Switch our code to not pass priorities to node names
Remove the possibility of passing priorities to node names
We should only be able to set phase names on a pipe_base object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Jakob and I think it would be better to have phase names (with priorities) and node names (without priorities) than the current setup where we only have node names with priorities, and the phase name is the node name with highest priority.
We should only be able to set phase names on a
pipe_base
object.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: