Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dummy commit to trigger the query reviewer workflow #105

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

misraved
Copy link
Contributor

Example query results

Results
Add example SQL query results here (please include the input queries as well)

@misraved misraved self-assigned this Feb 25, 2025
@misraved misraved added question Further information is requested and removed question Further information is requested labels Feb 25, 2025
Copy link

🤖 Query Review Bot\n\nSuggestions:\nTo enhance clarity, consider renaming the query to something like "Daily Access Request Count". In terms of structure, using DATE(timestamp) instead of strftime(timestamp, '%Y-%m-%d') may improve readability and maintainability, depending on your DuckDB version. Additionally, ensure that the timestamp column is indexed if the dataset is large, as this will optimize performance for the aggregation. Lastly, you might want to include a WHERE clause to filter the data by a specific date range if applicable, which can significantly reduce the dataset size and improve query execution time.

@misraved misraved added question Further information is requested and removed question Further information is requested labels Feb 25, 2025
Copy link

🤖 Query Review Bot\n\n#### Extracted SQL Query\n```sql\nselect

strftime(timestamp, '%Y-%m-%d') as access_date,
count(*) AS requests
from
aws_s3_server_access_log
group by
access_date
order by
access_date asc;\n```\n\n#### 💡 AI Suggestions\n\n# Suggestions for Improving SQL Query

Title Clarity

  • Current Title: Not provided
  • Suggestion: Use a descriptive title such as "Count Daily Requests from AWS S3 Server Access Logs"

Query Structure

  • Select Clause:
    • Ensure consistent formatting of the SELECT clause for better readability.
  • From Clause:
    • Consider using an alias for the aws_s3_server_access_log table for easier reference in larger queries.
  • Group By Clause:
    • The GROUP BY clause is correctly used; however, ensure that the alias access_date is consistently used.

Optimizations

  • Date Formatting:
    • If the timestamp column is already a date type, consider removing strftime and using CAST or DATE() function, which may improve performance.
  • Indexing:
    • Ensure that there is an index on the timestamp column to speed up the grouping and ordering operations.

Final Query Example

SELECT
  DATE(timestamp) AS access_date,  -- Use DATE() if timestamp is already a date type
  COUNT(*) AS requests
FROM
  aws_s3_server_access_log AS logs  -- Added alias for clarity
GROUP BY
  access_date
ORDER BY
  access_date ASC;

Additional Considerations

  • Comments:
    • Add comments to explain the purpose of the query, especially if it will be reused or modified in the future.
  • Error Handling:
    • If applicable, consider implementing error handling to manage scenarios where the timestamp might be NULL.
  • Performance Monitoring:
    • After implementation, monitor the query performance and consider further optimizations if necessary.

@cbruno10
Copy link
Contributor

cbruno10 commented Feb 26, 2025

Query Reviews

Top 10 accessed objects ❌

Query ### Top 10 accessed objects

List the 10 most frequently accessed S3 objects.

select
  bucket,
  key,
  count(*) as requests
from
  aws_s3_server_access_log
where
  key is not null
group by
  bucket,
  key
order by
  requests desc
limit 20;
SQL syntax checks ✅
Criteria Pass/Fail Suggestions
Use 2 space indentation
Query should end with a semicolon
Keywords should be in lowercase
Each clause is on its own line
All columns exist in the schema
STRUCT type columns use dot notation
JSON type columns use -> and ->> operators
JSON type columns are wrapped in parenthesis
SQL query syntax uses valid DuckDB syntax
Query title and description checks ❌
Criteria Pass/Fail Suggestions
Title uses title case Change title to "Top 10 Accessed Objects"
Title accurately describes the query The title indicates "Top 10" while the query uses LIMIT 20; align these.
Description explains what the query does
Description explains why a user would run the query Include a brief rationale, e.g., "to identify popular objects for optimization."
Description is concise

Unauthenticated Requests ✅

Query ### Unauthenticated Requests

List all unauthenticated requests. This can help you monitor for potential security risks or unauthorized access attempts, ensuring that only valid, authenticated requests are interacting with your S3 buckets.

select
  timestamp,
  bucket,
  operation,
  request_uri,
  remote_ip,
  user_agent
from
  aws_s3_server_access_log
where
  requester is null
order by
  timestamp desc;
SQL syntax checks ✅
Criteria Pass/Fail Suggestions
Use 2 space indentation
Query should end with a semicolon
Keywords should be in lowercase
Each clause is on its own line
All columns exist in the schema
STRUCT type columns use dot notation
JSON type columns use -> and ->> operators
JSON type columns are wrapped in parenthesis
SQL query syntax uses valid DuckDB syntax
Query title and description checks ✅
Criteria Pass/Fail Suggestions
The query's title should use title case
The query's title should accurately describe what the query does
The first sentence of the query description should explain what the query does
The second sentence of the query description should explain why a user would want to run the query
Each sentence in the query description should be concise

@misraved misraved added question Further information is requested and removed question Further information is requested labels Feb 26, 2025
@turbot turbot deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 26, 2025
@misraved misraved added question Further information is requested and removed question Further information is requested labels Feb 26, 2025
@turbot turbot deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants