Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

added a check for n dimensional field in point_columns #524

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

added a check for n dimensional field in point_columns #524

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kzqureshi
Copy link
Contributor

@kzqureshi kzqureshi commented Apr 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Type

bug_fix

Description

  • Updated the setter method for point_columns in discretisedfield/line.py to dynamically check the length against _point_columns.
  • This modification prevents errors when setting point_columns with a list length that matches the actual dimensions of the field, enhancing robustness.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
line.py
Update validation logic in point_columns setter                   

discretisedfield/line.py

  • Modified the condition in the setter method for point_columns to check
    against the length of _point_columns instead of a fixed value.
  • This change ensures that the validation of point_columns is dynamic
    and adapts to the actual dimensions of the field.
    		• +1/-1     

    ✨ PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    closes #389

    @kzqureshi kzqureshi requested a review from swapneelap April 26, 2024 15:47
    @github-actions GitHub Actions
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (2016596)

    @github-actions GitHub Actions
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the PR involves a simple logic change in a setter method, which is straightforward to understand and verify. The change is localized to one condition in one method, making the review process relatively quick.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Possible Bug: If self._point_columns is not initialized or is dynamically changed elsewhere in the code, the new condition could lead to unexpected behavior or errors. It's important to ensure that self._point_columns is always properly set before this setter is called.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No
    Code feedback:
    relevant filediscretisedfield/line.py
    suggestion      

    Consider adding a null or type check for self._point_columns before comparing its length to val. This will prevent potential TypeError or AttributeError if _point_columns is None or not an iterable. [important]
    relevant lineif len(val) != len(self._point_columns):
    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

    [pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @github-actions GitHub Actions
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Enhancement
    Correct a typo in the error message.

    Correct the typo in the error message from "lenght" to "length".

    discretisedfield/line.py [174]

    -msg = f"Cannot change column names with a list of lenght {len(val)}."
+msg = f"Cannot change column names with a list of length {len(val)}."
    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

    [pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

    See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @kzqureshi kzqureshi requested review from lang-m and removed request for swapneelap December 13, 2024 11:37
    lang-m
    lang-m requested changes Feb 2, 2025
    View reviewed changes
    Copy link
    Member

    @lang-m lang-m left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    We cannot rely on self._point_columns for this test. Instead we should use the shape of points for this check. Further details are best discussed in person.

    @lang-m lang-m mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2025
    Open
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers

    @lang-m lang-m lang-m requested changes

    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    bug_fix Review effort [1-5]: 2
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    Bug(Line): setter method of point_columns
    2 participants
    @kzqureshi @lang-m