Weird naming for *CreateInput

[kasir-barati]

Here is my schema.prisma:

generator client {
  provider = "prisma-client-js"
}

generator nestgraphql {
  provider = "node node_modules/prisma-nestjs-graphql"
  output   = "../src/@generated"
}

datasource db {
  provider = "postgresql"
  url      = env("DATABASE_URL")
}

model AlertType {
  id          String    @id @default(uuid())
  name        String    @unique @db.VarChar(200)
  description String?   @db.VarChar(500)
  createdAt   DateTime  @default(now()) @map("created_at") @db.Timestamptz()
  updatedAt   DateTime? @updatedAt @map("updated_at") @db.Timestamptz()

  Alerts Alert[]

  @@map("alert_types")
}

model Alert {
  id          String    @id @default(uuid())
  title       String    @db.VarChar(200)
  description String?   @db.VarChar(500)
  userId      String    @map("user_id") @db.Uuid
  createdAt   DateTime  @default(now()) @map("created_at") @db.Timestamptz()
  updatedAt   DateTime? @updatedAt @map("updated_at") @db.Timestamptz()

  AlertType   AlertType @relation(fields: [alertTypeId], references: [id])
  alertTypeId String    @map("alert_type_id")

  @@map("alerts")
}

Why when I run the prisma generate my AlertCreateInput looks like this:

import { Field } from '@nestjs/graphql';
import { InputType } from '@nestjs/graphql';
import { AlertTypeCreateNestedOneWithoutAlertsInput } from '../alert-type/alert-type-create-nested-one-without-alerts.input';

@InputType()
export class AlertCreateInput {

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:true})
    id?: string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:false})
    title!: string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:true})
    description?: string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:false})
    userId!: string;

    @Field(() => Date, {nullable:true})
    createdAt?: Date | string;

    @Field(() => Date, {nullable:true})
    updatedAt?: Date | string;

    @Field(() => AlertTypeCreateNestedOneWithoutAlertsInput, {nullable:false})
    AlertType!: AlertTypeCreateNestedOneWithoutAlertsInput;
}

This does not make any sense to me, why we have AlertType while I was expecting it to have alertTypeId instead. And instead the AlertCreateManyInput kinda makes more sense but the naming this time is not correct IMO:

import { Field } from '@nestjs/graphql';
import { InputType } from '@nestjs/graphql';

@InputType()
export class AlertCreateManyInput {

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:true})
    id?: string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:false})
    title!: string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:true})
    description?: string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:false})
    userId!: string;

    @Field(() => Date, {nullable:true})
    createdAt?: Date | string;

    @Field(() => Date, {nullable:true})
    updatedAt?: Date | string;

    @Field(() => String, {nullable:false})
    alertTypeId!: string;
}

I also saw issue #219 which also has the same issue since we have AlertCreateManyAlertTypeInput which does not have any of relation fields but its name is really confusing.

I would love to see/contribute on making this naming better. @unlight how can I make this change. I am not sure from where I should start TBH. And I also fear this might introduce breaking change.

[unlight]

why we have AlertType

You have AlertType field in your schema, if you will check prisma types you will see the same field in AlertCreateMany type