You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @scottyhq and @dshean,
I uploaded two notebooks. In this example, the horizontal projection of EPT file is EPSG:3857, and the vertical heights are with respect to the NAVD88 geoid. We found that reprojecting during pdal processing with the compound CRS involved was taking 5 times the time without any reprojection involved. So the first notebook grids the DSM in EPSG:3857, and then uses gdalwarp after the fact specifying the a_srs correctly. The second notebook does the proper reprojection during the pdal processing, using parallelization and smaller tile sizes. There are some differences in the two outputs and I do note that there are seam artifacts caused with the smaller tile size. What do you think would be the best strategy to process them here?
Regardless of at what stage we introduce reprojection, I think we also need to understand the different noise filters which are currently turned on by default, as I suspect they might also cause some errors. Starting a different thread to track that down.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ShashankBice
changed the title
Notebooks
Notebooks to generate DSM using reprojection after gridding DSM, and reprojection during pdal processing using smaller tiles.
Jan 14, 2025
Hi @scottyhq and @dshean,
I uploaded two notebooks. In this example, the horizontal projection of EPT file is EPSG:3857, and the vertical heights are with respect to the NAVD88 geoid. We found that reprojecting during pdal processing with the compound CRS involved was taking 5 times the time without any reprojection involved. So the first notebook grids the DSM in EPSG:3857, and then uses gdalwarp after the fact specifying the a_srs correctly. The second notebook does the proper reprojection during the pdal processing, using parallelization and smaller tile sizes. There are some differences in the two outputs and I do note that there are seam artifacts caused with the smaller tile size. What do you think would be the best strategy to process them here?
Thanks to @kvenkman for sharing the recipe 😊
Regardless of at what stage we introduce reprojection, I think we also need to understand the different noise filters which are currently turned on by default, as I suspect they might also cause some errors. Starting a different thread to track that down.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: