You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are using the LCM facility to stage package through systems.
We have a base filter for denying packages more recent than a specific date.
We have now created a filter for a patch with the advisory name and used the Allow rule.
However, this patch is never visible on the client systems.
Does the Deny rule contradict the Allow rule here?
Or is there a conflict between the Deny rule for packages with a certain date and the Allow rule for patches?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Dear all,
We are using the LCM facility to stage package through systems.
We have a base filter for denying packages more recent than a specific date.
We have now created a filter for a patch with the advisory name and used the Allow rule.
However, this patch is never visible on the client systems.
Does the Deny rule contradict the Allow rule here?
Or is there a conflict between the Deny rule for packages with a certain date and the Allow rule for patches?
Regards
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions