From 60a13f683c10d6ada51ea1510d7a450ae94730ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:59:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Add issue marker for citing DID Core.

---
 index.html | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 6dbcbbd..d725a54 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -339,10 +339,19 @@ <h2>Introduction</h2>
 It is expected that other specifications will profile
 the features that are defined in this specification, requiring and/or
 recommending the use of some and prohibiting and/or deprecating the use of
-others. For example, [[[?DID-CORE]]] is expected to define DID documents as a
-profile of controller documents, where the DID is the identifier, DID documents
-are controller documents, and resolution is the process of retrieving the
-canonical DID document for a DID.
+others.
+      </p>
+
+      <p class="issue" title="Clarify that profiles of this document will happen">
+The W3C TAG review noted that they would like to see language that clarifies
+that this document would be useful to authors that would like to profile its
+usage. The DID Core specification is one such document that does that, but
+citing it directly received objections. This issue notes that the WG intends to
+resolve the text below into something that we can achieve consensus on:<br><br>
+<em>For example, the Decentralized Identifiers Specification is expected to
+define DID documents as a profile of controller documents, where the DID is the
+identifier, DID documents are controller documents, and resolution is the
+process of retrieving the canonical DID document for a DID.</em>
       </p>
 
       <section>