Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exhibition access content microcopy should reflect what's available #11495

Open
davidpmccormick opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
Bug 🐛 A change made to ensure a feature is maintaining the baseline KPIs.

Comments

@davidpmccormick
Copy link
Contributor

davidpmccormick commented Jan 9, 2025

Editorial have had to work around the fact that the access microcopy references things that might not be available.

We should find a way to dynamically update the copy based on what is available so that the appropriate Prismic section can be filled in and the access information is consistently displayed across exhibitions.

@davidpmccormick davidpmccormick converted this from a draft issue Jan 9, 2025
@davidpmccormick davidpmccormick added the Bug 🐛 A change made to ensure a feature is maintaining the baseline KPIs. label Jan 9, 2025
@pollecuttn
Copy link
Contributor

@davidpmccormick is that link in the description correct? When I follow it I get a 'there's been a bit of a hitch' message.

@rcantin-w
Copy link
Contributor

@pollecuttn Lalita created a private channel for this conversation. I'll ask if wc-editorial can be used in the future.

@rcantin-w
Copy link
Contributor

Would this become part of the Exhibition access work? I've added the milestone, please remove if I'm wrong.
(@davidpmccormick )

@davidpmccormick
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would this become part of the Exhibition access work

Fairly sure that's right. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug 🐛 A change made to ensure a feature is maintaining the baseline KPIs.
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants