You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm doing css for almost 6 years now. I still don't have a reply for "how to properly set consistent responsive typography on a web page", despite the 123812831 articles i've read.
If some want's to tackle this here's what the minimum expected:
A map/variables to define font-sizes + line-height pairs, and scale multiplier,
A mixin/function to include responsive font-sizes.
A mixin/function to include font-sizes from the scale, without the responsiveness for custom places, like menus bars and other specific components.
Naming: the naming methafors can go wild really u-fs-sm is really hard to grasp in what part of the scale because it could exist infinite variations xsm xxsmtailwind style, then sometimes line-height needs to be reseted for a menu or something. Greek styles alpha beta gamma, i'm sorry i can't remember all the names neither their order (maybe i'm the only one). We could use the same nx of spacing where n is the multiplier vs the baseline. Maybe we can use the same for base font-size. if base font-size is 16px, u-fs-2x = 32px, but for smaller variations we would need to wrap our heads around the math like using ems or rems but can be better.
Then you have exceptions: display headings (those jumbo big typesettings for specific situations)
I've seen people advocating for literal naming u-type-16 => 16px but in rem with companion line-height and letter spacing. My scalable sense was against it when i first saw it, but i do start to think that the advantages (instant reckon) outcome the disadvantages (dom tied to css, changin css requires change in html, but damn, how often do you change a typescale? that should be like the first thing in the process, and we can always add more types as in, we won't reach more than 20 styles i would say ref)
The old way used to be something like this, plus an extra-field to the letter spacing. If you think this is enough we can easily add it.
I'm doing css for almost 6 years now. I still don't have a reply for "how to properly set consistent responsive typography on a web page", despite the 123812831 articles i've read.
If some want's to tackle this here's what the minimum expected:
u-fs-sm
is really hard to grasp in what part of the scale because it could exist infinite variationsxsm xxsm
tailwind style, then sometimes line-height needs to be reseted for a menu or something. Greek stylesalpha beta gamma
, i'm sorry i can't remember all the names neither their order (maybe i'm the only one). We could use the samenx
of spacing where n is the multiplier vs the baseline. Maybe we can use the same for base font-size. if base font-size is 16px,u-fs-2x
= 32px, but for smaller variations we would need to wrap our heads around the math like usingems
orrems
but can be better.u-type-16
=> 16px but in rem with companion line-height and letter spacing. My scalable sense was against it when i first saw it, but i do start to think that the advantages (instant reckon) outcome the disadvantages (dom tied to css, changin css requires change in html, but damn, how often do you change a typescale? that should be like the first thing in the process, and we can always add more types as in, we won't reach more than 20 styles i would say ref)The old way used to be something like this, plus an extra-field to the letter spacing. If you think this is enough we can easily add it.
Some tools and references to get started
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: