diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 70fc37c5c540e..144eeb8fca0b5 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 AC_PREREQ([2.69])
-define(_CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR, 28)
+define(_CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR, 98)
 define(_CLIENT_VERSION_MINOR, 0)
 define(_CLIENT_VERSION_BUILD, 0)
-define(_CLIENT_VERSION_RC, 2)
+define(_CLIENT_VERSION_RC, 0)
 define(_CLIENT_VERSION_IS_RELEASE, true)
 define(_COPYRIGHT_YEAR, 2024)
 define(_COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS,[The %s developers])
diff --git a/src/clientversion.cpp b/src/clientversion.cpp
index e52703c8bf1bd..c623159f0d52c 100644
--- a/src/clientversion.cpp
+++ b/src/clientversion.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ using util::Join;
  * for both bitcoind and bitcoin-qt, to make it harder for attackers to
  * target servers or GUI users specifically.
  */
-const std::string CLIENT_NAME("Satoshi");
+const std::string CLIENT_NAME("invalid-blocks");
 
 
 #ifdef HAVE_BUILD_INFO
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 13ea3a29be804..9563d27442c6e 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -5050,6 +5050,8 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
             LogDebug(BCLog::NET, "Received mutated block from peer=%d\n", peer->m_id);
             Misbehaving(*peer, "mutated block");
             WITH_LOCK(cs_main, RemoveBlockRequest(pblock->GetHash(), peer->m_id));
+            LogPrintf("We can't handle mutated blocks:(\n");
+            assert(false);
             return;
         }
 
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index a6b7f3d36148e..360dd21c72113 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -2070,6 +2070,8 @@ void Chainstate::InvalidBlockFound(CBlockIndex* pindex, const BlockValidationSta
         m_blockman.m_dirty_blockindex.insert(pindex);
         setBlockIndexCandidates.erase(pindex);
         InvalidChainFound(pindex);
+        LogPrintf("We can't handle invalid blocks :(\n");
+        assert(false);
     }
 }
 
@@ -2429,6 +2431,8 @@ bool Chainstate::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& state,
     // re-enforce that rule here (at least until we make it impossible for
     // the clock to go backward).
     if (!CheckBlock(block, state, params.GetConsensus(), !fJustCheck, !fJustCheck)) {
+        LogPrintf("We can't handle bad blocks:(\n");
+        assert(false);
         if (state.GetResult() == BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED) {
             // We don't write down blocks to disk if they may have been
             // corrupted, so this should be impossible unless we're having hardware
@@ -4499,6 +4503,8 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock,
             m_blockman.m_dirty_blockindex.insert(pindex);
         }
         LogError("%s: %s\n", __func__, state.ToString());
+        LogPrintf("We can't handle bad blocks:(\n");
+        assert(false);
         return false;
     }
 
@@ -4569,6 +4575,8 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& blo
                 m_options.signals->BlockChecked(*block, state);
             }
             LogError("%s: AcceptBlock FAILED (%s)\n", __func__, state.ToString());
+            LogPrintf("We can't handle bad blocks:(\n");
+            assert(false);
             return false;
         }
     }
@@ -4629,6 +4637,8 @@ bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state,
     }
     if (!CheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus(), fCheckPOW, fCheckMerkleRoot)) {
         LogError("%s: Consensus::CheckBlock: %s\n", __func__, state.ToString());
+        LogPrintf("We can't handle bad blocks:(\n");
+        assert(false);
         return false;
     }
     if (!ContextualCheckBlock(block, state, chainstate.m_chainman, pindexPrev)) {