feat: pass the MLS public key signature algorithm when updating MLS public keys [WPB-8592] 🍒

[github-actions]

WPB-8592 [Android] Add support for ECDSA ciphersuites

This PR was automatically cherry-picked based on the following PR:

• feat: pass the MLS public key signature algorithm when updating MLS public keys #2720

Original PR description:

---

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

pass the MLS public key signature algorithm when updating MLS public keys

Solutions

whe getting the public key form MLS client also append the cipher suite used for that key and then mapped it to a signature algorithm that is used when uploading the key to the backend

Dependencies (Optional)

If there are some other pull requests related to this one (e.g. new releases of frameworks), specify them here.

Needs releases with:

• GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

Briefly describe how this change was tested and if applicable the exact steps taken to verify that it works as expected.

Notes (Optional)

Specify here any other facts that you think are important for this issue.

Attachments (Optional)

Attachments like images, videos, etc. (drag and drop in the text box)

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[yamilmedina]

Can we add the JIRA ticket here please :D

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 041 tests   2 937 ✔️  4m 3s ⏱️
   528 suites     104 💤
   528 files           0 ❌

Results for commit 55a5a25.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/pass-signature-algorithm-when-registring-mls-client-cherry-pick
Commit report: 3e94049
Test service: kalium-jvm

❌ 1 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 2902 Passed, 52 Skipped, 12.39s Total Time

❌ Failed Tests (1)

• givenAnAssetId_whenDownloadingPrivateAssetWithWrongAssetHash_thenShouldReturnAWrongAssetHashError[jvm] - com.wire.kalium.logic.data.asset.AssetRepositoryTest - Details

  Expand for error

   java.lang.AssertionError: Expected a Left value but got Right
   
   java.lang.AssertionError: Expected a Left value but got Right
   	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
   	at kotlin.test.junit.JUnitAsserter.fail(JUnitSupport.kt:56)
   	at kotlin.test.AssertionsKt__AssertionsKt.fail(Assertions.kt:520)
   	at kotlin.test.AssertionsKt.fail(Unknown Source)
   	at com.wire.kalium.logic.util.EitherAssertionsKt.shouldFail(EitherAssertions.kt:91)
   	at com.wire.kalium.logic.data.asset.AssetRepositoryTest$givenAnAssetId_whenDownloadingPrivateAssetWithWrongAssetHash_thenShouldReturnAWrongAssetHashError$1.invokeSuspend(AssetRepositoryTest.kt:398)
   	at com.wire.kalium.logic.data.asset.AssetRepositoryTest$givenAnAssetId_whenDownloadingPrivateAssetWithWrongAssetHash_thenShouldReturnAWrongAssetHashError$1.invoke(AssetRepositoryTest.kt)
   ...
  

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 46.42857% with 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release/candidate@dbc6e8f). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##             release/candidate    #2734   +/-   ##
====================================================
  Coverage                     ?   58.83%           
====================================================
  Files                        ?     1213           
  Lines                        ?    47158           
  Branches                     ?     4428           
====================================================
  Hits                         ?    27745           
  Misses                       ?    17406           
  Partials                     ?     2007           

Files	Coverage Δ
...n/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/cryptography/MLSClient.kt	51.35% <ø> (ø)
.../wire/kalium/logic/data/client/ClientRepository.kt	46.15% <100.00%> (ø)
...m/logic/feature/client/RegisterMLSClientUseCase.kt	95.83% <100.00%> (ø)
...ork/api/base/authenticated/client/ClientRequest.kt	84.48% <100.00%> (ø)
...logic/data/client/remote/ClientRemoteRepository.kt	53.57% <20.00%> (ø)
...tlin/com/wire/kalium/logic/data/mls/CipherSuite.kt	29.16% <8.33%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dbc6e8f...07b76b2. Read the comment docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud