-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider replacing getset
crate
#209
Comments
gset
crategetset
crate
@flavio thank you for the report. @Hoverbear do you think we can make |
I imagine it would be possible to make that change. @jbaublitz took over the crate sometime a couple years back, perhaps he would be willing to review a PR. (Thanks for reminding me to pass over crate ownership on crates.io) |
Hi @saschagrunert. I have reviewed a PR upstream to update syn to version 2. I have to look into what's pulling in the I unmaintained version a little bit more and see if just updating syn will resolve the issue (out of office at the moment but should have time to take a look at this later today). |
The
getset
is consuming theproc-macro-error
dependency.The
RUSTSEC-2024-0370
advisory has just been issued becauseproc-macro-error
is no longer maintained.getset
looks unmaintained too, but doesn't have a RUSTSEC advisory assigned to it, yet.While IMHO this is nothing serious from a security POV, it would be nice to evaluate the feasibility of replacing
getset
with a similar crate that is actively maintained and doesn't pull in unmaintained dependencies.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: