You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to detect anomalous temperature points. I have several datasets manually labeled. Now my task is to find the best model that would give the highest recall, since missing anomalous temperature point is critical. Would it be fair:
Train various models on each dataset
predict() results on test set and compare with true labels
Select the model that has highest recall
The problem I think of is that if I used decision_function() and, let's say, used 0.3 threshold as anomalous, different models would give better results than models that I tested on predict(). Also, there are thousands of datasets and I would not know the correct threshold for each dataset.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I am trying to detect anomalous temperature points. I have several datasets manually labeled. Now my task is to find the best model that would give the highest recall, since missing anomalous temperature point is critical. Would it be fair:
The problem I think of is that if I used decision_function() and, let's say, used 0.3 threshold as anomalous, different models would give better results than models that I tested on predict(). Also, there are thousands of datasets and I would not know the correct threshold for each dataset.
So what would the best way to select the model?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions