vim::Tag doesn't respect self closing or void tags

[babyccino]

Summary

Here is some sample html

<one>
  <two>
  <three />
  <four />
  <five></five>
</one>

Actual Behavior:

Doing d a t over elements two, three or four deletes the whole of tag one while doing d a t over element five deletes just element five

Expected Behavior:

Doing d a t over elements two, three or fours should just delete those tags

Zed Version and System Specs

Zed: v0.171.3 (Zed)
OS: macOS 15.3.0
Memory: 18 GiB
Architecture: aarch64

[probably-neb]

Interesting, I would expect this to be the default behavior as well. However, learned something new today,
it seems this is actually behavior we are emulating directly from Vim as this is how Vim (& Neovim) work by default as well.
By in large we attempt to copy vim's behavior exactly (where possible), but this seems like it could be a reasonable place to diverge. Therefore I'm going to put this in the category of "feature requests" and convert this to a discussion.
Would love to see some input from the community around whether this should be a setting, the default behavior, etc.

[babyccino]

All of the above is valid HTML so I would strongly agree that the default Vim behaviour shouldn't be emulated in Zed, or at least give an option to diverge from Vim and handle self-closing and void tags(?). In frameworks self closing tags are even more common than they are in regular HTML so this would be a very nice QOL improvement

[a-hariti]

I like the Zed's pragmatic approach to Vim emulation

I never liked this behavior on Neo(vim)