Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: removes syncers for aggkit migration #256

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: feat/aggkit-repo-migration
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rachit77
Copy link
Contributor

@rachit77 rachit77 commented Jan 7, 2025

Description

This PR removes syncers and other relevant packages for aggkit repo migration

@rachit77 rachit77 changed the title Removes syncers for aggkit migration feat: removes syncers for aggkit migration Jan 7, 2025
@rachit77 rachit77 marked this pull request as draft January 7, 2025 13:22
@rachit77 rachit77 self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@rachit77 rachit77 marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 14:52
* remove aggoracle component

* improve Rust build perf and cleanup

* handle error when unmarashaling versions.json
* remove aggsender component

* fix: remove build-tools
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal force-pushed the feat/aggkit-repo-migration branch from 79c94e2 to 04b8363 Compare January 21, 2025 11:37
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2025
3 tasks
Stefan-Ethernal and others added 5 commits January 21, 2025 15:41
* mockery generate

* Update .mockery.yaml

Co-authored-by: Stefan Negovanović <[email protected]>

* review comments

* review comment

---------

Co-authored-by: Stefan Negovanović <[email protected]>
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal force-pushed the rachit77/remove-syncers branch from d814581 to ac8d966 Compare January 27, 2025 10:51
@rachit77 rachit77 requested a review from a team January 28, 2025 14:15
@@ -276,16 +276,6 @@ RetryAfterErrorPeriod = "1s"
MaxRetryAttemptsAfterError = -1
WaitForNewBlocksPeriod = "3s"

[LastGERSync]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need to discuss about the config we will leave in the cdk repo on the office hours. Maybe it makes sense to remove bunch of stuff.

"github.com/0xPolygon/cdk/rpc/types"
tree "github.com/0xPolygon/cdk/tree/types"
"github.com/agglayer/aggkit/claimsponsor"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might be one more topic to discuss. Should bridge rpc endpoints be left in the cdk or in the aggkit repo.

@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal force-pushed the feat/aggkit-repo-migration branch from baa4aaa to 7116e38 Compare February 4, 2025 14:50
@Stefan-Ethernal
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we reuse the following packages from the aggkit as well (and remove it from the cdk):

  • db,
  • etherman (partially),
  • hex,
  • log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants