Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kjob storage configuration for run command #408

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mbobrovskyi
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes / Features

  • Kjob storage configuration for run command.

Testing / Documentation

Testing details.

  • [ y/n ] Tests pass
  • [ y/n ] Appropriate changes to documentation are included in the PR

@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi changed the base branch from main to develop March 5, 2025 16:05
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi added enhancement New feature or request release-features features and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 5, 2025
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi changed the title Kjob storage configuration for run command WIP: Kjob storage configuration for run command Mar 5, 2025
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 16:10
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi force-pushed the mbobrovskyi/kjob-storage-configuration-run branch from d93b9b0 to 5639d2d Compare March 5, 2025 16:17
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi force-pushed the mbobrovskyi/kjob-storage-configuration-run branch from 5639d2d to eecccda Compare March 6, 2025 06:27
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi changed the title WIP: Kjob storage configuration for run command Kjob storage configuration for run command Mar 6, 2025
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi force-pushed the mbobrovskyi/kjob-storage-configuration-run branch from e23f35c to 083125a Compare March 6, 2025 17:06
@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi force-pushed the mbobrovskyi/kjob-storage-configuration-run branch from 083125a to f168e7a Compare March 6, 2025 17:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants