-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#59: create adjust endpoint for reading checkpoint defintion of partioning #96
#59: create adjust endpoint for reading checkpoint defintion of partioning #96
Conversation
…ver-adjustments' into feature/#50-Create-or-adjust-endpoint-for-accepting-and-saving-checkpoint-data # Conflicts: # server/src/main/scala/za/co/absa/atum/web/model/Checkpoint.scala
…ver-adjustments' into feature/#50-Create-or-adjust-endpoint-for-accepting-and-saving-checkpoint-data # Conflicts: # project/plugins.sbt
…repository to Runs
…accepting-and-saving-checkpoint-data
…accepting-and-saving-checkpoint-data
…point-for-accepting-and-saving-checkpoint-data' into feature/#50-Create-or-adjust-endpoint-for-accepting-and-saving-checkpoint-data
7bda244
to
2db07ba
Compare
e16e9d0
to
ed5a6bf
Compare
JaCoCo agent module code coverage report - spark:2 - scala 2.12.12
|
JaCoCo server module code coverage report - scala 2.12.12
|
4bd6d03
to
a92e1ba
Compare
…ding-checkpoint-defintion-of-partioning
/** | ||
* Function to retrieve checkpoint based on the provided fields | ||
* | ||
* @param filterCriteria JSON object containing the fields for filtering the checkpoint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is this filterCriteria about? I saw it elsewhere as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It has being changed to partitioningInfo
.
|
||
test("testReadCheckpoint") {} | ||
|
||
test("testPostgresAccessProvider") {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this doesn't really test anything, is it still in progress?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it was just a preparation and I forgot to remove them because the implementation was totally wrong.
I really need this so I fixed the merge conflicts and did some refactoring. Apologies @TebaleloS, I know that it's not a good practice to do this, but I want to work on the #23 during the weekend a bit. I also removed the Partitioning Created DTO you created, because PartitioningDTO is perfectly suitable for the job now I think. If something is missing, we can add it there, not creating a new DTO that is almost the same as the old one. |
The build is failing because of the unit tests in |
…ding-checkpoint-defintion-of-partioning
…ding-checkpoint-defintion-of-partioning
Closing, replaced by #121 and future PR related to the DB tests |
Retrieve checkpoint endpoint
Closes #59