Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sara-Branches #25

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Sara-Branches #25

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sarashahbaig
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@CheezItMan CheezItMan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall nice work, you hit the learning goals here. Well done. Check my comments below especially with regard to time/space complexity. Let me know if you have questions.

# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?
# Time complexity: 0(n)
# Space complexity: 0(n)
def factorial(n)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

raise NotImplementedError, "Method not implemented"

return s if s.length < 2
return reverse(s[1..-1]) + s[0]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s[1..-1] creates a new array and copies all the individual elements over and so is O(n) by itself.

# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?
# Time complexity: 0(n)
# Space complexity: 0(n)
def reverse(s)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍
This works, but because you create a new array with each recursive call this is O(n2) for both time/space complexity.


return s if s.length < 2
return reverse(s[1..-1]) + s[0]

end

# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?
def reverse_inplace(s)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. This is not done in place
  2. It's calling the method above.

Comment on lines 37 to 38
# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

def nested_helper(s)
return true if s.empty?
return false if s.length.odd?
return nested_helper(s)
end

# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?
def search(array, value)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 This works, but you have similar time/space issues with the above methods.

def is_palindrome_helper(s, index)
return true if s.empty? || s.length ==1
return false if s[0] != s[s.length - index]
is_palindrome_helper(s[1..s.length - index - 1], 1)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're both slicing the array and using index as 1, I'm not sure why index is needed as a param at all.

raise NotImplementedError, "Method not implemented"
return false if array.nil?
return true if array[0] == value
return search(array[1..-1],value)
end

# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?
def is_palindrome(s)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 This works, but you have similar time/space issues with the above methods.

if n % 10 == m % 10
count += 1
end
if (n / 10 == 0 || m / 10 == 0)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🏆 Nice catch!

return true if s.empty? || s.length ==1
return false if s[0] != s[s.length - index]
is_palindrome_helper(s[1..s.length - index - 1], 1)

end

# Time complexity: ?
# Space complexity: ?
def digit_match(n, m)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants