Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bulk enhancement with congestion control #32434

Closed
wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

aditishree1
Copy link
Member

@aditishree1 aditishree1 commented Jan 6, 2025

Packages impacted by this PR

@azure/cosmos

Issues associated with this PR

#29100
#30376

Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

This PR enhances the flow of Bulk API. It implements custom retry policy for bulk and dynamically controls degree of concurrency for each partition according to throttling and no. of items processed.

What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR chosen?

https://excalidraw.com/#room=ac45daa258e67c6fd89d,jkOfy1GkGAKwRUYZkTGgog

Are there test cases added in this PR? (If not, why?)

Provide a list of related PRs (if any)

Command used to generate this PR:**(Applicable only to SDK release request PRs)

Checklists

  • Added impacted package name to the issue description
  • Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** (If so, create an Issue in the Autorest/typescript repository and link it here)
  • Added a changelog (if necessary)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Cosmos label Jan 6, 2025
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

API change check

APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews.

@azure/cosmos

@aditishree1 aditishree1 changed the title Bulk congestion control Bulk enhancement with congestion control Jan 7, 2025
@aditishree1 aditishree1 marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 04:14
@aditishree1 aditishree1 marked this pull request as draft January 11, 2025 10:38
@aditishree1
Copy link
Member Author

Moved to #32567

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants