-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Instructions to run KG_RAG on mac #34
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
config.yaml
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed hardcoded paths and added /workspaces
to standardize the local dev across platforms.
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ asttokens==2.4.0 | |||
async-lru==2.0.4 | |||
async-timeout==4.0.3 | |||
attrs==23.1.0 | |||
auto-gptq==0.4.2 | |||
# auto-gptq==0.4.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't install this and find any usage in the codebase. Can we remove this from the requirements?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would probably keep this, because, some users utilize quantized model to run KG-RAG. And I presume this was added by them.
# nvidia-cublas-cu11==11.10.3.66 | ||
# nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu11==11.7.101 | ||
# nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu11==11.7.99 | ||
# nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu11==11.7.99 | ||
# nvidia-cudnn-cu11==8.5.0.96 | ||
# nvidia-cufft-cu11==10.9.0.58 | ||
# nvidia-curand-cu11==10.2.10.91 | ||
# nvidia-cusolver-cu11==11.4.0.1 | ||
# nvidia-cusparse-cu11==11.7.4.91 | ||
# nvidia-nccl-cu11==2.14.3 | ||
# nvidia-nvtx-cu11==11.7.91 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't install the specific versions. Is this required?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i know local models such as llama and sentence transformers make use of nvidia gpu to run the operations (which I tried in the linux server). so this maybe useful for that. but I haven't checked it otherwise.
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ tornado==6.3.3 | |||
tqdm==4.66.1 | |||
traitlets==5.10.0 | |||
transformers==4.33.2 | |||
triton==2.0.0 | |||
# triton==2.0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this required? Couldn't install this either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i presume this is also related to nvidia gpu. so same explanation as above
@@ -392,5 +392,6 @@ def interactive(question, vectorstore, node_context_df, embedding_function_for_c | |||
output = llm_chain.run(context=node_context_extracted, question=question) | |||
elif "gpt" in llm_type: | |||
enriched_prompt = "Context: "+ node_context_extracted + "\n" + "Question: " + question | |||
output = get_GPT_response(enriched_prompt, system_prompt, llm_type, llm_type, temperature=config_data["LLM_TEMPERATURE"]) | |||
chat_model_id, chat_deployment_id = get_gpt35() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noticed that chat_deployment_id
was same as chat_model_id
if not using this step when using GPT_API_TYPE : 'open_ai'
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if api type is open_ai, I think chat_deployment_id is None. Please see my response given below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you try changing the absolute path to relative path?
for example:
instead of:
VECTOR_DB_DISEASE_ENTITY_PATH : '/workspaces/KG_RAG/data/disease_with_relation_to_genes.pickle'
try:
VECTOR_DB_DISEASE_ENTITY_PATH : 'KG_RAG/data/disease_with_relation_to_genes.pickle'
since the code is run as a module from the KG_RAG directory, I think this should be fine and the users do not need to change the path. Can you please change it and test it? If it works fine, then please change it to the relative path format.
- [Step 4: Update config.yaml](https://github.com/BaranziniLab/KG_RAG#step-4-update-configyaml) | ||
- [Step 5: Run the setup script](https://github.com/BaranziniLab/KG_RAG#step-5-run-the-setup-script) | ||
- [Step 6: Run KG-RAG from your terminal](https://github.com/BaranziniLab/KG_RAG#step-6-run-kg-rag-from-your-terminal) | ||
- [Step 2: Setup using Dev Containers](https://github.com/BaranziniLab/KG_RAG#step-2-setup-using-dev-containers) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really liked the container-based setup. However, I am aware that some users have managed to run KG-RAG without it, skipping straight from Step 1 to the 'Create a virtual environment' step. Therefore, if the container-based setup is only necessary for macOS users, could you please mark this step as 'Optional' and note that it's specifically for macOS installation?
@@ -392,5 +392,6 @@ def interactive(question, vectorstore, node_context_df, embedding_function_for_c | |||
output = llm_chain.run(context=node_context_extracted, question=question) | |||
elif "gpt" in llm_type: | |||
enriched_prompt = "Context: "+ node_context_extracted + "\n" + "Question: " + question | |||
output = get_GPT_response(enriched_prompt, system_prompt, llm_type, llm_type, temperature=config_data["LLM_TEMPERATURE"]) | |||
chat_model_id, chat_deployment_id = get_gpt35() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One problem with the new line 395 is that it will always call gpt-3.5, regardless of whether the user specified other gpt models, such as gpt-4.
I think the better option here is to change line 395:
from:
chat_model_id, chat_deployment_id = get_gpt35()
to:
chat_deployment_id = chat_model_id if openai.api_type == "azure" else None
Do you agree?
What
Created a PR to set up KG on macOS successfully. Related to issue #35.
Changes
Added a
.devcontainer
directory to the root path. This contains aDockerfile
andpostCreateCommand.sh
shell script to set up the environment. Note: This requires installing docker on the local machine first.Added a sample
.gpt_config.env
file for quick modification and setup by users.Commented certain libraries in the
requirements.txt
file which showed errors during installation, same as described in issue Issues setting up KGRAG on macOS #35. Since I couldn't find any direct usage of these libraries, I commented them out to successfully install the dependencies and test KG_RAG using the instructions provided in the README file.Changes to
kg_rag/run_setup.py
-- Create
LLM_CACHE_DIR
does not exist-- Raise value error if there's an exception encountered while downloading llama model.
Changes to
kg_rag/utitlities.py
-- Modified the parameters getting passed to
get_GPT_response
when using interactive modeUpdated the
.gitignore
file to not check theLLM_CACHE_DIR
and__pycache__
files