Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension API history and dark mode friendly logo #617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

SwapnilChand
Copy link
Contributor

@SwapnilChand SwapnilChand commented Oct 16, 2024

API History Management Enhancements

  • Purpose:
    Implement features to manage and persist API request history in the Visual Studio Code extension.
  • Key Changes:
    • Added support for reading and writing API request history in MessagePack format.
    • Implemented loadApiHistory() and saveApiHistory() functions for handling history operations.
    • Updated handleApiRequest() function to add new API requests to the history.
    • Integrated API history management with the extension's global state.
    • Renamed the title from "API Request" to "API Client" for clarity.
    • Introduced a flexible layout with separate request and response panels.
    • Added support for multiple authentication methods (Basic and Bearer).
    • Implemented tabbed navigation for organizing query parameters, headers, authentication, and request body.
    • Enhanced JSON response formatting for better readability.
  • Impact:
    These changes significantly improve user experience and functionality, making it easier to send requests and view responses.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description None

Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

🔍 Code Review Summary

Attention Required: This push has potential issues. 🚨

Overview

  • Total Feedbacks: 3 (Critical: 3, Refinements: 0)
  • Files Affected: 2
  • Code Quality: [█████████████████░░░] 85% (Good)

🚨 Critical Issues

performance (3 issues)

1. Synchronous file system operations may block the event loop.


📁 File: extensions/vscode/src/apiRequest/apiRequestProvider.ts
🔍 Reasoning:
Using synchronous file operations (e.g., fs.readFileSync) can lead to performance bottlenecks, especially if the file size is large or the operation is frequent.

💡 Solution:
Use asynchronous file operations to improve performance and responsiveness.

Current Code:

const packedData = fs.readFileSync(filePath);

Suggested Code:

const packedData = await fs.promises.readFile(filePath);

2. Potential exposure of sensitive data in logs.


📁 File: extensions/vscode/src/apiRequest/apiRequestProvider.ts
🔍 Reasoning:
Logging error messages that may contain sensitive information can lead to security vulnerabilities.

💡 Solution:
Sanitize error messages before logging them to avoid exposing sensitive data.

Current Code:

console.error(`Error reading or decoding the file: ${error.message}`);

Suggested Code:

console.error(`Error reading or decoding the file.`); // Avoid logging sensitive error details

3. Potential XSS vulnerability in response rendering.


📁 File: extensions/vscode/webview/apiRequest/index.html
🔍 Reasoning:
Directly injecting user-generated content into the DOM without sanitization can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

💡 Solution:
Ensure that any user-generated content is properly sanitized before rendering.

Current Code:

document.getElementById('response').innerHTML = `<pre class="json-formatter">${formattedBody}</pre>`;

Suggested Code:

                document.getElementById('response').textContent = formattedBody;

Test Cases

7 file need updates to their tests. Run !unittest to generate create and update tests.


✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Useful Commands
  • Feedback: Share feedback on kaizens performance with !feedback [your message]
  • Ask PR: Reply with !ask-pr [your question]
  • Review: Reply with !review
  • Update Tests: Reply with !unittest to create a PR with test changes

@sauravpanda sauravpanda merged commit 9c21530 into Cloud-Code-AI:main Oct 17, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants