Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Input Validation for API URL #637

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Kaos599
Copy link
Contributor

@Kaos599 Kaos599 commented Oct 29, 2024

Validate PR Request Inputs

  • Purpose:
    Improve input validation for GitHub PR requests.
  • Key Changes:
    • Added a Pydantic model PRRequestModel to validate owner, repo, and PR number inputs.
    • Implemented a validate_pr_request wrapper function to validate the inputs.
    • Updated get_pr_info and get_pr_files functions to use the validated data.
  • Impact:
    Ensures that the provided inputs for owner, repo, and PR number are valid, reducing the risk of errors and improving the overall robustness of the code.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description # Enhance PR Input Validation
  • **Purpose:
    **
    Improve input validation for pull request data using Pydantic.
  • Key Changes:
    • Introduced PRRequestModel for structured input validation.
    • Added validate_pr_request function to encapsulate validation logic.
    • Updated get_pr_info and get_pr_files functions to use validated data.
    • Added error handling for validation errors with clear output.
  • **Impact:
    **
    Increases robustness of the code by ensuring valid inputs before making API calls.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description # Enhance PR Input Validation
  • ****Purpose:
    **
    **
    Improve input validation for pull request data using Pydantic.
  • Key Changes:
    • Introduced PRRequestModel for structured input validation.
    • Added validate_pr_request function to encapsulate validation logic.
    • Updated get_pr_info and get_pr_files to utilize validated data.
    • Enhanced error handling for input validation with ValidationError.
  • ****Impact:
    **
    **
    Increases robustness of the code by ensuring valid input before making API calls.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description # Validate PR Request Inputs
  • ******Purpose:
    **
    **
    **
    Improve input validation for GitHub PR requests.
  • Key Changes:
    • Added a Pydantic model PRRequestModel to validate the owner, repo, and pr_number inputs.
    • Implemented a validate_pr_request wrapper function to validate the inputs before making the API calls.
    • Updated the get_pr_info and get_pr_files functions to use the validated inputs.
  • ******Impact:
    **
    **
    **
    This change ensures that the input parameters for the GitHub PR requests are properly validated, reducing the risk of errors and improving the overall robustness of the code.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description - Introduced pydantic model `PRRequestModel` to validate `owner`, `repo`, and `pr_number` inputs before constructing GitHub API URLs - Enforced input rules: - `owner` should match GitHub username conventions (1-39 alphanumeric characters) - `repo` should follow GitHub repo naming conventions (1-100 characters, allowing '.', '_', '-') - `pr_number` should be a positive integer - Updated `get_pr_info` and `get_pr_files` functions to use validated inputs, ensuring only compliant values are used in API requests - Added error handling in `main` function to catch `ValidationError` and provide clear feedback on invalid inputs - Improved security by sanitizing inputs, mitigating the risk of URL manipulation leading to API abuse and unauthorized access

Copy link
Contributor

@kaizen-bot kaizen-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.

kaizen/tests/actions/diff_pr_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sauravpanda
Copy link
Member

@Kaos599 can you fix the linting issues, we use black and flake8

@Kaos599
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kaos599 commented Oct 30, 2024

@sauravpanda I have made changes that should resolve all flake8 linting issues (E302, E305, and F722).

Before merging also assign this PR with the hacktoberfest label.
Thank you

@sauravpanda sauravpanda added hacktoberfest Hacktoberfest 2024 hacktoberfest-accepted Accepted for hacktoberfest! labels Oct 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented Oct 31, 2024

🔍 Code Review Summary

All Clear: This commit looks good! 👍

Overview

  • Total Feedbacks: 0 (Critical: 0, Refinements: 0)
  • Files Affected: 0
  • Code Quality: [█████████████████░░░] 85% (Good)
Test Cases

3 file need updates to their tests. Run !unittest to generate create and update tests.


✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Useful Commands
  • Feedback: Share feedback on kaizens performance with !feedback [your message]
  • Ask PR: Reply with !ask-pr [your question]
  • Review: Reply with !review
  • Update Tests: Reply with !unittest to create a PR with test changes

@Kaos599
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kaos599 commented Oct 31, 2024

@sauravpanda. Sorry for the previous issue. I have revised the code to fit Flake8 and Black's Compliance.

  • All changes have been tested with workflows in my forked repo

@sauravpanda sauravpanda merged commit abd584e into Cloud-Code-AI:main Nov 2, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hacktoberfest Hacktoberfest 2024 hacktoberfest-accepted Accepted for hacktoberfest!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants