You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there. I want to discuss a new feature here.
When we load some workflow with missing node types. The node will show red and replace the name with undefined. Can we just remain the original the node name, or maybe just add a suffix of “[undefined]”. So that even we can't run the workflow, we can read the workflow and try to understand what's going on without running it. I think it's better for user to quickly read and understand the workflow.
As I commented on the other issue:
Yes, I agree. Whenever I try to help someone with their workflow, I can't figure anything out unless I have all the custom nodes installed.
If possible, it would be great to also see the widgets, so it is clearer what the problem might be (e.g. wrong models, wrong values, etc.).
Yeah, that is pretty frustrating. I've ended up just reading the json in the past. Whilst full details are not saved to the workflow, quite a bit is, and showing anything other than a handful of eye-melting-red blobs will be a good start.
p.s. Should have mentioned: one time-saver is simply right clicking the node - context menu should have the node type in tiny-text at the top. Proper solution is in the works, though.
Hi there. I want to discuss a new feature here.
When we load some workflow with missing node types. The node will show red and replace the name with undefined. Can we just remain the original the node name, or maybe just add a suffix of “[undefined]”. So that even we can't run the workflow, we can read the workflow and try to understand what's going on without running it. I think it's better for user to quickly read and understand the workflow.
Original issue link: comfyanonymous/ComfyUI#5770
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: