Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add rule fapolicy_default_deny to rhel9 stig #12930

Merged

Conversation

ggbecker
Copy link
Member

Description:

  • add rule fapolicy_default_deny to rhel9 stig

Rationale:

  • Rule is now part of the RHEL9 STIG

@ggbecker ggbecker added RHEL9 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 product related. STIG STIG Benchmark related. labels Jan 29, 2025
@ggbecker ggbecker added this to the 0.1.76 milestone Jan 29, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Used by openshift-ci bot. label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ggbecker ggbecker marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 14:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Used by openshift-ci bot. label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Code Climate has analyzed commit cf95bf9 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 61.9% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@Mab879 Mab879 self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@Mab879 Mab879 merged commit 95eed20 into ComplianceAsCode:master Jan 29, 2025
109 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RHEL9 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 product related. STIG STIG Benchmark related.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants