Keep compatibility for context key

[pinosu]

See #2075

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.99%. Comparing base (aafd0e0) to head (25fa6ea).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2077      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.97%   42.99%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          85       85              
  Lines       11601    11601              
==========================================
+ Hits         4986     4988       +2     
+ Misses       6167     6166       -1     
+ Partials      448      447       -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
x/wasm/types/context.go	13.88% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[chipshort]

I didn't know this is something we should keep stable across versions. Does anyone depend on the exact values?

[pinosu]

I didn't know this is something we should keep stable across versions. Does anyone depend on the exact values?

Context keys are set as an enumeration so I think it is good to not mix keys that have different scopes but rather create a new one for new scope.
This topic anyway will be irrelevant in future releases because from cosmos-sdk v0.52 onwards the sdk context is deprecated and also this storage.

[chipshort]

Alright, then let's keep them stable