Want z position cut to be more liberal for reco tracks #93
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For reco tracks, we can't be sure the front/end of the reco track is the primary track. Like the reco track might be two particles, and the end of the track is mostly particle 2. But we want the true track position to point to the nearest matching z position of the "primary" particle that makes up the track, ie the one contributing the most true energy. So expand the cut so it will find the nearest true position regardless of distance.
Also expands the z cut in general for true position starting/ending at TMS/LAr so that we have more info. But I don't think we care if we're too far because we can use birth/death position for those particles