Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(llmobs): introduce ragas eval integration #12143

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

lievan
Copy link
Contributor

@lievan lievan commented Jan 29, 2025

Publicize the RAGAS integration

RAGAS is an evaluation framework for RAG Applications. The integration supports evaluating LLM inferences with three RAGAS metrics

  • faithfulness
  • answer relevancy
  • context precision

dupe of #11939 to get in ddtrace 3.0

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

@lievan lievan marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 16:34
@lievan lievan requested review from a team as code owners January 29, 2025 16:34
@lievan lievan requested review from sanchda and nsrip-dd January 29, 2025 16:34
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/ragas-integration-a81b696757c0e7a5.yaml              @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/llmobs/_evaluators/runner.py                                    @DataDog/ml-observability
ddtrace/llmobs/_evaluators/sampler.py                                   @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_evaluator_runner.py                            @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_ragas_evaluators.py                            @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_service.py                                     @DataDog/ml-observability

@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: evan.li/release-ragas-3.0
Commit report: 092306e
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 130 Passed, 1468 Skipped, 5m 5.47s Total duration (35m 38.84s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-01-31 17:27:51

Comparing candidate commit 7fbfc76 in PR branch evan.li/release-ragas-3.0 with baseline commit 4ebedf0 in branch 3.x-staging.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 394 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

Copy link
Member

@Kyle-Verhoog Kyle-Verhoog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small thing, good to go once addressed!

ddtrace/llmobs/_evaluators/runner.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ddtrace/llmobs/_evaluators/sampler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lievan lievan requested a review from Kyle-Verhoog January 30, 2025 18:32
@lievan lievan merged commit 7257296 into 3.x-staging Jan 31, 2025
250 checks passed
@lievan lievan deleted the evan.li/release-ragas-3.0 branch January 31, 2025 19:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants