Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reorganize file layout #72

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: brian.myers/241230/misc4
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bcmyers
Copy link
Contributor

@bcmyers bcmyers commented Dec 31, 2024

Reorganize file layout.

@bcmyers bcmyers mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024
@bcmyers bcmyers marked this pull request as ready for review December 31, 2024 01:30
This was referenced Dec 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcmyers commented Dec 31, 2024

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
Copy link
Contributor

@joneshf-dd joneshf-dd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good for Language Tools!

One potential ❓. But don't block if it's not relevant.


pkg_go_binary_multiple_platforms(
name = "ocitool",
go_binary = ["//go/cmd/ocitool:go_default_library"],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ question: Is this supposed to be a label? If so, here's a quick suggestion to fix it:

Suggested change
go_binary = ["//go/cmd/ocitool:go_default_library"],
go_binary = "//go/cmd/ocitool:go_default_library",

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, maybe we either slap a build_test on this, or do bazel build //... in the ci job to catch this sort of stuff?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants