-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: kip9 version remove & test-11 payload active #210
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve multiple modifications across various files in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploy preview for hibit-id ready! ✅ Preview Built with commit 7f7ea8b. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/mass/storage-mass-calc.ts (1)
Line range hint
31-35
: Document the optimization condition rationaleThe condition for optimized mass calculation path should be documented to explain why these specific cases (
outsLen === 1n || insLen === 1n || (outsLen === 2n && insLen === 2n)
) are handled differently.Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale:
+ // Optimize mass calculation for common transaction patterns: + // - Single input or output transactions + // - Two inputs and two outputs (common in standard transactions) if (outsLen === 1n || insLen === 1n || (outsLen === 2n && insLen === 2n)) {packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/network-params.ts (1)
64-84
: Consider extracting network parameters to a configuration fileThe network parameters are currently hardcoded in the source code. Consider moving them to a configuration file for better maintainability and easier updates.
Example structure:
// network-config.ts export const NETWORK_CONFIGS = { mainnet: { coinbaseTransactionMaturityPeriodDaa: 100n, coinbaseTransactionStasisPeriodDaa: 50n, userTransactionMaturityPeriodDaa: 10n, additionalCompoundTransactionMass: 100n }, testnet11: { // ... testnet11 specific values }, // ... other networks };packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/params.ts (1)
430-431
: Consider adding timezone information in the comment.The comment about the activation date could be more specific by including the timezone in a standardized format.
- // Roughly at Dec 3, 2024 1800 UTC + // Activation time: 2024-12-03T18:00:00Zpackages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/generator/genrator.ts (2)
Line range hint
684-692
: Add documentation for the storage mass calculation logicWhile the code is functionally correct, it would benefit from documentation explaining the business logic behind the condition
storageMassWithChange === 0n || storageMassWithChange < computeMassWithChange
. This would help future maintainers understand why this specific comparison is important for the mass calculation.+ // If storage mass is zero or less than compute mass, we don't need to + // consider additional fees for storage mass in the transaction if (storageMassWithChange === 0n || storageMassWithChange < computeMassWithChange) { return 0n; } else {
Line range hint
1-800
: Consider breaking down the Generator classThe Generator class is quite large and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused classes:
- MassCalculator: Extract mass calculation logic
- TransactionBuilder: Handle transaction construction
- UTXOManager: Handle UTXO selection and management
This would improve maintainability and testability of the codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/constants/perf.ts
(1 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/network-params.ts
(1 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/params.ts
(2 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/index.ts
(0 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/kip/index.ts
(0 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/kip/kip9.ts
(0 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/generator/genrator.ts
(3 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/mass/signed-tx-mass-calc.ts
(2 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/mass/storage-mass-calc.ts
(1 hunks)packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/mass/unsigned-tx-mass-calc.ts
(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/index.ts
- packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/kip/kip9.ts
- packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/kip/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/constants/perf.ts (1)
5-5
: Verify the 4x increase in reindex slack
The DEFAULT_REINDEX_SLACK has been increased from 1n << 12n
to 1n << 14n
, which quadruples the slack interval. This could impact the reachability algorithm's performance when handling blocks outside the selected chain.
Please confirm if this significant increase is intentional and required. Consider documenting the rationale for this change.
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/network-params.ts (1)
74-74
: Verify increased maturity periods for TESTNET11
TESTNET11 has significantly higher maturity periods compared to other networks:
- Coinbase maturity: 1000n vs 100n (10x increase)
- Coinbase stasis: 500n vs 50n (10x increase)
- User transaction maturity: 100n vs 10n (10x increase)
These increases will result in longer confirmation times for transactions on TESTNET11.
Please confirm if these increased periods are intentional and document the rationale for this change.
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/mass/signed-tx-mass-calc.ts (2)
82-87
: LGTM! Method signature simplified.
The removal of the Kip9Version parameter streamlines the method while maintaining its core functionality.
97-101
: LGTM! Mass calculation logic simplified.
The simplified logic maintains the correct behavior of selecting the larger mass between storage and compute mass, while removing unnecessary version-specific branching.
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/mass/unsigned-tx-mass-calc.ts (1)
174-174
: LGTM! Mass combination logic simplified.
The simplified logic correctly maintains the behavior of selecting the larger mass while removing version-specific handling.
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/consensus/config/params.ts (2)
51-52
: LGTM! New property well documented.
The payloadActivation property is properly documented with a clear description of its purpose.
429-432
: Verify the implications of shared activation timestamp.
Both kip10Activation and payloadActivation are set to activate at the same timestamp (Dec 3, 2024 1800 UTC). Please confirm if this simultaneous activation is intentional and if there are any dependencies between these features that need to be considered.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about these features to better understand their relationship and implementation.
Let me gather more specific information about these features and their dependencies.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Simultaneous activation of KIP10 and payload features appears intentional and safe.
The code review reveals that:
- Both features are part of the network's consensus parameters and are managed through the
ForkActivation
mechanism - There are no direct dependencies or conditional relationships between these features in the codebase
- The payload feature is related to transaction payload fields, while KIP10 appears to be a separate protocol upgrade
- Both are being activated at block height 287238000 (Dec 3, 2024 1800 UTC) in a coordinated network upgrade
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any dependencies between kip10 and payload features
rg -l "kip10.*payload|payload.*kip10" --type ts
# Search for any existing payload-related code that might be affected
rg "payload.*activation" --type ts
Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for kip10 related code and its usage
rg "kip10" --type ts -A 3
# Search for payload related implementations
rg "payload" --type ts -A 3
# Look for any configuration or documentation about these features
fd "README|CHANGELOG" -e md -X cat
Length of output: 56058
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any code that checks or uses these activation flags
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$kip10Activation$$$) { $$$ }'
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$payloadActivation$$$) { $$$ }'
# Look for any tests or documentation related to these features
rg -A 3 "kip10.*activation|payload.*activation" --type ts --type md
Length of output: 1041
packages/coin-kaspa/src/lib/tx/generator/genrator.ts (1)
123-123
: LGTM: Simplified massCalculator initialization
The initialization has been improved by deriving params directly from networkId, making the code more maintainable.
Summary by CodeRabbit