-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add H2OLNZ in zonal mean 2d stratosphere #868
Conversation
@tangq This PR add H2OLNZ to pressure latitude plots focusing stratosphere. Here is an example testing with v3_historical_0051. Let me know if you'd like further change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chengzhuzhang , the changes look good to me. The contour intervals can be tricky. It is good enough for the quick check purpose as it is.
It won't be available in E3SM Unified until the next version. Is there a way to quickly generate these plots? The EAMv3 overview paper has a tight timeline and it would be helpful to look at these plots. Thanks.
@tangq Thank you for reviewing. For quickly check other v3.historical runs. You could try source my build of e3sm_diags on LCRC with the command:
The command to generate the H2OLNZ plots is:
Just to replace the Alternatively, since I already have the environment set up. I can quickly generate the same set for the v3 runs of interests, just let me know. |
The CI/CD tests passed after LCRC maintenance yesterday. Merging. |
Hi @chengzhuzhang , I didn't catch this earlier. The H2OLNZ plot and the Q plot use different units. This makes it harder to compare them. Can we change it to the same unit? I'd suggest that we change it all to match the Q plot, i.e., ppm and absolute difference. Thanks. |
@tangq, Just to clarify for the stratosphere focused plots, you'd like to use e3sm_diags/e3sm_diags/driver/zonal_mean_2d_driver.py Lines 162 to 173 in 6b0a245
If it is the case, I can add the logic to convert |
@chengzhuzhang , that's right. I suggest we use Is my understanding correct that the code you pointed out multiplies Q (in g/kg) by 1000 to get Q in ppm? If so, it is ppm by weight. We need to add the molecular weight ratio to get the ppm by volume, which is the typical unit in this case. If mv1_p is in g/kg, |
Description
Checklist
If applicable: