Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python: Warn old warpx.multifab Signature #5326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

ax3l
Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l commented Sep 25, 2024

Warn users that use the old warpx.multifab("internal_name") overload to use the new one that only requests a prefix, with dir and level as extra arguments.

Follow-up to #5321

Warn users that use the old `warpx.multifab("internal_name")` overload
to use the new one that only requests a prefix, with dir and level as
extra arguments.
@ax3l ax3l added changes input scripts / defaults Changes the syntax or meaning of input scripts and/or defaults component: Python Python layer labels Sep 25, 2024
@ax3l ax3l requested a review from RemiLehe September 25, 2024 02:46
@ax3l ax3l added the warning A compiler or tool warning label Sep 25, 2024
@RemiLehe RemiLehe requested review from EZoni and removed request for RemiLehe October 28, 2024 22:59
@RemiLehe RemiLehe assigned EZoni and unassigned RemiLehe Oct 28, 2024
@EZoni EZoni requested a review from dpgrote November 4, 2024 17:49
Copy link
Member

@dpgrote dpgrote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, thanks!

@EZoni EZoni merged commit 78cf034 into ECP-WarpX:development Nov 4, 2024
37 checks passed
RemiLehe added a commit to RemiLehe/WarpX that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
RemiLehe added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
It seems that the changes of #5326 is causing confusion among some
users.

With #5326, users typically receive a message saying that the "signature
is deprecated" (which is actually incorrect ; this should say "will soon
be deprecated"). As a consequence, users think that their simulation
result is invalid (which is again incorrect ; using this signature is
still fine for now), and try to change it according the printed
instuctions, i.e.:
```
Please use:
- multifab('prefix', level=...) for scalar fields
- multifab('prefix', dir=..., level=...) for vector field components
```
But because there is no link to a concrete example or test, users
typically try:
```
multifab("Efield_fp", dir=0, level=0)
```
and then get 
```
TypeError: multifab(): incompatible function arguments. The following argument types are supported:
    1. (self: pywarpx.warpx_pybind_3d.WarpX, internal_name: str) -> amrex.space3d.amrex_3d_pybind.MultiFab
    2. (self: pywarpx.warpx_pybind_3d.WarpX, scalar_name: str, level: int) -> amrex.space3d.amrex_3d_pybind.MultiFab
    3. (self: pywarpx.warpx_pybind_3d.WarpX, vector_name: str, dir: pywarpx.warpx_pybind_3d.Direction, level: int) -> amrex.space3d.amrex_3d_pybind.MultiFab
```
I am guessing that most users will get stuck at this point. 

The error message does suggest that the user has to create a `Direction`
object, but since there is no example on how to create this, it is
unlikely that most users will be able to overcome this issue.

I would suggest to temporarily revert #5326, and then re-introduce it
with:
- updated instructions on how to create a `Direction` objects
- updated warning that says "will be deprecated" instead of "is
deprecated".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changes input scripts / defaults Changes the syntax or meaning of input scripts and/or defaults component: Python Python layer warning A compiler or tool warning
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants