MpRTP modifications on OpenWebRTC

[balazskreith]

Hi,

I would like to automatically merge from the master branch to keep this branch updated.

[stefanalund]

@superdump @stefhak @zaheduzzaman how do we handle this one?

[superdump]

@balazskreith - Is this ready for review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

[balazskreith]

I need to finish the congestion control test implemented in the plugin,
then I assemble it to the openwebrtc and then we can start the review
process. Write to all of you soon.

On 23 January 2016 at 08:00, Robert Swain [email protected] wrote:

@balazskreith https://github.com/balazskreith - Is this ready for
review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment)
.

[IngJohEricsson]

Hi
Curious. What kind of congestion control is it?

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 15:29 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>:

I need to finish the congestion control test implemented in the plugin,
then I assemble it to the openwebrtc and then we can start the review
process. Write to all of you soon.

On 23 January 2016 at 08:00, Robert Swain <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

@balazskreith https://github.com/balazskreith - Is this ready for
review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment)
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/491#issuecomment-174190101.

[balazskreith]

I try a combination of ScREAM and adaptive FEC.

On 23 January 2016 at 17:09, IngJohEricsson [email protected]
wrote:

Hi
Curious. What kind of congestion control is it?

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 15:29 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>:

I need to finish the congestion control test implemented in the plugin,
then I assemble it to the openwebrtc and then we can start the review
process. Write to all of you soon.

On 23 January 2016 at 08:00, Robert Swain <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

@balazskreith https://github.com/balazskreith - Is this ready for
review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment)
.

[IngJohEricsson]

Interesting
And very interested to know your findings and if you encounter issues with SCReAM
Ingemar

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 22:30 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>:

I try a combination of ScREAM and adaptive FEC.

On 23 January 2016 at 17:09, IngJohEricsson <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi
Curious. What kind of congestion control is it?

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 15:29 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>:

I need to finish the congestion control test implemented in the plugin,
then I assemble it to the openwebrtc and then we can start the review
process. Write to all of you soon.

On 23 January 2016 at 08:00, Robert Swain <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

@balazskreith https://github.com/balazskreith - Is this ready for
review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment)
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/491#issuecomment-174224161.

[balazskreith]

I updated openwebrtc and cerbero at https://github.com/multipath-rtp.

You can build it by git clone https://github.com/multipath-rtp/cerbero.

cerbero is altered by using gst-mprtp and
https://github.com/multipath-rtp/openwebrtc recipe to build.

multipath-rtp/openwebrtc only differs from EricssonResearch/openwebrtc by
its transport/owr_transport_agent., which contains the mprtp plugin and
providing interfaces to join and detach subflows and the
tests/test_send_receive, which join subflow while running the elements.

Its only the basic, gst-mprtp can control number of subflow and distribute
a traffic a given ratio determined by the application uses it (i.e.:
openwebrtc). There are tons of possibility and I also know there are tons
of issues I have if you will start it reviewing.
Please notify me if you tried it, or you have questions.

Balázs

On 24 January 2016 at 10:38, IngJohEricsson [email protected]
wrote:

Interesting
And very interested to know your findings and if you encounter issues with
SCReAM
Ingemar

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 22:30 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>:

I try a combination of ScREAM and adaptive FEC.

On 23 January 2016 at 17:09, IngJohEricsson <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi
Curious. What kind of congestion control is it?

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 15:29 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>:

I need to finish the congestion control test implemented in the plugin,
then I assemble it to the openwebrtc and then we can start the review
process. Write to all of you soon.

On 23 January 2016 at 08:00, Robert Swain <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

@balazskreith https://github.com/balazskreith - Is this ready for
review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<

#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment)
.

[balazskreith]

I forgot to add that I am planning that longer mail to send you on next
week.

On 13 February 2016 at 20:36, Balázs Kreith [email protected] wrote:

I updated openwebrtc and cerbero at https://github.com/multipath-rtp.

You can build it by git clone https://github.com/multipath-rtp/cerbero.

cerbero is altered by using gst-mprtp and
https://github.com/multipath-rtp/openwebrtc recipe to build.

multipath-rtp/openwebrtc only differs from EricssonResearch/openwebrtc by
its transport/owr_transport_agent., which contains the mprtp plugin and
providing interfaces to join and detach subflows and the
tests/test_send_receive, which join subflow while running the elements.

Its only the basic, gst-mprtp can control number of subflow and distribute
a traffic a given ratio determined by the application uses it (i.e.:
openwebrtc). There are tons of possibility and I also know there are tons
of issues I have if you will start it reviewing.
Please notify me if you tried it, or you have questions.

Balázs

On 24 January 2016 at 10:38, IngJohEricsson [email protected]
wrote:

Interesting
And very interested to know your findings and if you encounter issues
with SCReAM
Ingemar

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 22:30 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>:

I try a combination of ScREAM and adaptive FEC.

On 23 January 2016 at 17:09, IngJohEricsson <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi
Curious. What kind of congestion control is it?

Skickat från min iPhone

23 jan. 2016 kl. 15:29 skrev balazskreith <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]>:

I need to finish the congestion control test implemented in the plugin,
then I assemble it to the openwebrtc and then we can start the review
process. Write to all of you soon.

On 23 January 2016 at 08:00, Robert Swain <[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

@balazskreith https://github.com/balazskreith - Is this ready for
review? Does it work? Does it break any standard use cases?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<

#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
#491 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment)
.

[Zubnix]

This is open for over a year now. What's the current status of this PR? What's keeping it from being merged?