Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trashcan folder "same volume" check is too restrictive #28

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

buttercookie42
Copy link

If I'm understanding it right, the current "Make sure the trashcan folder is on the same volume as the shared folder, so we can rename deleted files" check basically only allows siblings of the shared folder when setting a custom trashcan path.

In my opinion, this is
a) unnecessarily restrictive and
b) doesn't even guarantee that the two folders actually are residing on the same volume, because what with mountpoints, filesytem junctions, symbolic links and what not any two folders in an arbitrary relationship to each other could reside on completely different volumes.

Unfortunately the one proper solution I've quickly stumbled upon seems to be Android-specific (Android has added Java APIs for calling fstat), so for now I'd just suggest perhaps relaxing the check a bit (allowing child folders by default, too), plus adding a hook to allow overriding the check by implementors.

The previous code only allowed sibling folders of the root dir (which doesn't
actually guarantee anything about them being on the same volume or not).
This is too restrictive (e.g. for hiding the folder inside Android's external
files dir), so allow children of the root folder, too.
I know a better method to check for the "same volume" condition, but it's
Android-specific. So until somebody can come up with a platform-independendent
way of implementing this check properly, allow overriding this method by
implementers.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant